Ukrainian counsel Podolyak criticizes India and China’s understanding of the ultramodern world.
In a recent controversial comment, Mykhailo Podolyak, an counsel to the Ukrainian chairman, sparked heated debates as he questioned the intellectual capabilities of China and India.
Podolyak’s commentary appeared to belittle the intellectual prowess of these global titans, pertaining to them as showing a ‘ weak intellectual eventuality ’.
Deeper Analysis or Loose Comment? Podolyak’s commentary were made public by Sputnik, a global news agency.
He not only blamed these countries ’ intellectual capabilities but farther suggested that they’ve difficulties in completely comprehending the ultramodern world.
What’s wrong with India, China, and so forth? The problem is that they are not analyzing the consequences of their steps, these countries have weak intellectual potential, unfortunatel.
Yes, they invest in science. Yes, India has launched a lunar rover presently and is now trekking on the surface of the Moon, but that does not indicate that this country fully comprehends what the modern world is about”
A History of Tense Relations of Ukrainian With the rejuvenescence of an old videotape of the interview, this isn’t the first time that controversial commentary about Indians have began from Ukrainian officers.
Also read: Himachal CM Sukhu contributes funds of 51 lakh rupees to aid in disaster assistance.
Back in April, a post from the Ukrainian Defense Twitter account had also incited counterreaction, as it portrayed the Hindu goddess Kali in an odd disguise, evocative of Marilyn Monroe’s iconic image.
On Political and Politic Fronts Despite the difficulties, India’s station with Russia remains neutral since the onset of the Russia- Ukraine conflict.
In the recent G20 Summit, India made no specific citation of Russia as the war agitator in the sanctioned protestation. India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, has been harmonious in championing for dialogue and tactfulness in resolving the conflict, difficulties and felicitations.
The global scene bore substantiation, as the G20 protestation statement was celebrated as ‘ major ’ for its amicable agreement, while the Ukrainian foreign ministry abused it as “ nothing to be proud of ”, censuring its elision of Russia’s part in the conflict.
Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov lauded India’s running of the G20 peak as a ‘ success ’, for setting aside western influence. “We were able to prevent the West’s attempts to ‘Ukrainize’ the summit agenda,” Lavrov commented following the conclusion of the two-day G20 leadership meeting.
